// NATURE NEWS — SPAZIO & SCIENZA
AI-hallucinated citations should be treated as research misconduct
Search author on:
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nature recently reported that the preprint server arXiv is banning papers that contain references hallucinated by artificial-intelligence tools (see Nature 653, 988–989; 2026). Scientists continue to debate whether such citations constitute research misconduct (see Nature 652, 26–29; 2026).
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
AI watermarking efforts must encourage independent public scrutiny
Can maths survive AI? Fields medallist Terence Tao calls for a ‘Maths 2.0’ world
It’s time to teach peer review as a core research skill
Experienced researchers ‘disrupt’ less than rookie scientists — but their ideas last
ArXiv versus AI slop: will capping preprint submissions work?