// ARS TECHNICA — LINUX & OPEN SOURCE
Trump admin fights ABC lawsuit as watchdogs worry Disney will settle with FCC
FCC tells court it is “open-minded” about whether ABC should lose licenses.
The Federal Communications Commission yesterday urged a court to dismiss a Disney lawsuit and let the FCC continue a proceeding that could end in the nonrenewal of ABC’s broadcast licenses.
Meanwhile, two watchdog groups and individual viewers of ABC stations are trying to intervene in the lawsuit, saying they are worried Disney will agree to a settlement with the FCC that isn’t in the public’s interest. Disney opposed the motion, and a judge will have to decide whether the groups and individuals can act as intervenors in the case.
Disney sued the FCC on August 18, saying the agency is waging a “campaign of censorship” to retaliate against ABC for speech that President Trump doesn’t like. As the lawsuit gets underway, Trump continued his attacks on the media last weekend by demanding that the FCC punish or rebuke an NBC journalist for saying he has “mixed results” in his election endorsements.
The FCC filed a motion to dismiss the Disney lawsuit yesterday, defending the early license review that it ordered for the eight broadcast stations owned by ABC. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr has threatened ABC over jokes made by Jimmy Kimmel and political content on The View, but the FCC claims the early license review is strictly about other matters and that no decision has been made.
The FCC filing in US District Court for the District of Columbia said the proceeding is only about “allegations of unlawful discrimination” related to Disney’s diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. The FCC wants the court to toss the lawsuit entirely, or at least deny Disney’s request for a preliminary injunction that would halt the license review pending the outcome of litigation. The FCC said:
The Commission’s Chairman has repeatedly emphasized that, although the allegations against Disney are serious, he and the agency remain “open-minded,” have “not made a decision,” and are “going to follow the facts and the law wherever they [lead].” And the renewal process in progress does not abridge or otherwise affect Plaintiffs’ rights. Licensees with pending renewal applications are entitled to continue operating without interruption during the license period for the duration of the renewal proceeding—even were it to result in a hearing. In fact, even if the Commission were to deny the stations’ applications, their licenses would remain in effect for however long they might wish to seek judicial review.
The FCC alleged that Disney’s responses to the commission’s investigative inquiries “were deficient and nonresponsive,” necessitating the order for an early license review. The agency also said the district court lacks jurisdiction because FCC orders are reviewed by circuit appeals courts.
“Granting Plaintiffs’ request would mean taking administrative processes off the table before the Commission has seen and analyzed the voluminous evidence,” the FCC said. “This would only hobble the Commission’s efforts to investigate and resolve serious allegations that Disney has engaged in unlawful discrimination, and from otherwise ensuring that Disney’s stations are serving the public interest. Plaintiffs, in return, would only free themselves from the burdens of proving their case in administrative proceedings.”
In exchange for licenses to use spectrum, “Congress has required broadcasters to operate in the public interest,” the FCC said. “To foreclose the Commission from using all the tools at its disposal to investigate whether Plaintiffs are meeting their statutory and regulatory duties would seriously harm both the government and the public.”