// ARS TECHNICA — LINUX & OPEN SOURCE
Hegseth’s dubious low-T screening may flag up to 25 percent of the Army
Medical experts explicitly recommend against blanket screenings.
Up to a quarter of active-duty Army members could receive a low testosterone result from mandatory military screening, despite the true prevalence of the condition likely being a tiny fraction of that figure, according to a study published Thursday in JAMA.
The finding adds to concerns that the mandatory screening announced by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in July will lead to a cascade of unnecessary medical evaluations for military members. Those evaluations could result in inappropriate testing, inaccurate results and diagnoses, and overtreatment that could cause harm, including infertility. Medical experts, including the Endocrine Society and the American Urological Association (AUA), have recommended against blanket screenings for these reasons. Still, the Pentagon has moved forward with the plans, releasing clinical guidance in September.
The JAMA study highlights the reasons why testosterone levels are not measured in men without symptoms—and also offers a glimpse of how many Army members could become ensnared in the clinically dubious screenings.
Researchers at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Louisiana and the US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine in Massachusetts conducted the study. The researchers drew data from a large military health survey, which included members at five US Army installations. The survey data included morning blood draws from fasting military members. The samples were collected between August 2024 and January 2026.
From those samples, total testosterone levels were measured from 479 male, active-duty Army service members. (Those receiving testosterone treatment were excluded from the study—three men were excluded for this reason.) With some statistical weighting, the 479 included members were representative of the active-duty US Army personnel; the weighted mean age was about 30 years old, and the weighted mean body mass index (BMI) was 28.4, which falls in the “overweight” category.
Generally, experts are wary of universally screening men for low testosterone because testosterone measurements can be highly variable—and unhelpful. Levels can dip for a number of different reasons, including age, time of day, obesity, illness, physical stress, poor sleep, trauma, and various medications. Moreover, the conditions that can cause clinically significant low testosterone—a condition called male hypogonadism—are rare, affecting 1 percent of men at most. They include genetic conditions and problems with the pituitary gland.
Given the complexity, experts recommend that evaluations be prompted by patients self-reporting symptoms. In those cases, doctors use repeat testing and comprehensive evaluations to come to a firm diagnosis of male hypogonadism. With that being the current norm, researchers aren’t sure exactly what the military’s new universal screen will yield.
According to the new data, a large portion of the military may face alarming results. From the Army members in the survey, the weighted mean for morning total testosterone was 405 ng/dL. The Pentagon’s clinical guidance uses a threshold of less than 300 ng/dL for low testosterone, in line with recommendations from the AUA. Using that cutoff and extrapolating the data to the entire Army population, the researchers estimate that about 26 percent of active-duty Army service members would get a test result suggesting low testosterone.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has a harmonized reference cut-off that’s a little lower, at 264 ng/dL. With that threshold, about 15 percent of Army service members would be estimated to have a low testosterone result.