// THE VERGE — HARDWARE & GADGET
Meta launches cheaper smart glasses without Ray-Ban
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
They’re also $80 cheaper, and Alex Himel, Meta’s VP of wearables, says privacy improvements are on the way.
If you buy something from a Verge link, Vox Media may earn a commission. See our ethics statement.
Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
If you buy something from a Verge link, Vox Media may earn a commission. See our ethics statement.
Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed.
For the past three years, “Meta” and “Ray-Ban” have been synonymous in the smart glasses space. Not anymore. Yesterday, I slipped on several pairs of Meta Glasses — no Ray-Bans — in three different styles and seven colors. One style, I was told several times by various enthusiastic Meta spokespeople, is a collaboration with socialite and reality TV star Kylie Jenner.
Meta could’ve struck out on its own from the get-go, but teaming up with EssilorLuxottica and the Ray-Ban brand was a savvy move in entering the smart glasses space. Previous smart glasses looked straight out of a sci-fi flick, or were just dorky enough to be unappealing. Ray-Ban lending its iconic silhouettes, name recognition, and cultural cachet helped give Meta’s glasses an air of legitimacy. The fact that these smart glasses truly looked like ordinary glasses you wouldn’t be ashamed of wearing was a simple but inspired design choice. However, the glasses’ biggest hurdle may be their attachment to Meta and its history of privacy scandals. In recent weeks, both The New York Times and Wired have reported that the company is actively building a facial recognition feature for its smart glasses.